<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Home Crowd</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thehomecrowd.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thehomecrowd.com</link>
	<description>Home news for the Home Crowd</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 09:51:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Re-use of Entertainment centers as play kitchens by Amy</title>
		<link>http://thehomecrowd.com/2010/01/27/re-use-of-entertainment-centers-as-play-kitchens/comment-page-1/#comment-192</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 09:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thehomecrowd.com/?p=278#comment-192</guid>
		<description>Thanks so much for featuring my little girls play kitchen... she spends hours &#039;cooking&#039; in it!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks so much for featuring my little girls play kitchen&#8230; she spends hours &#8216;cooking&#8217; in it!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fold-out Window Balcony by Bloomframe® by ????</title>
		<link>http://thehomecrowd.com/2009/09/05/fold-out-window-balcony-by-bloomframe%c2%ae/comment-page-1/#comment-190</link>
		<dc:creator>????</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 16:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thehomecrowd.com/?p=271#comment-190</guid>
		<description>??,??????!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>??,??????!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Shipping Container Condos by Home</title>
		<link>http://thehomecrowd.com/2008/04/12/shipping-container-condos/comment-page-1/#comment-189</link>
		<dc:creator>Home</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 01:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thehomecrowd.com/?p=63#comment-189</guid>
		<description>Of course it&#039;s biased... I don&#039;t like it.  That&#039;s my bias.  

That&#039;s why it&#039;s an &quot;Opinion&quot;, they work best when you form your own.

And of course I have an understanding of this quirky little habitation fad, I called everyone I knew in the Shipping Container community, and had asked if I could jump on the bandwagon as well, but they said it was full.

Thing is, I find re-use of shipping containers to be a great idea, when produced in a practical manner, and generally much closer to the ground.  Just because each &#039;intact&#039; shipping container can support 35 tons, doesn&#039;t mean constructing a giant tower is necessarily the best housing solution.

This reminds me of straw-bale housing.  Sure it&#039;s a great idea, yet maybe not for a gigantic bale housing tower.

And certainly shipping containers could be a great answer to low-income housing.  Personally, if a shipping container was set up with basic amenities, I&#039;d prefer one in a disaster to the formaldehyde-filled FEMA trailers.

In terms of project scope, this project is very similar to the London Travelodge, as seen here on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.treehugger.com/files/2008/01/travelodge_buil.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Treehugger&lt;/a&gt;
The construction type seems very similar, and while they&#039;ve constructed this hotel from custom ordered containers directly from china, it would seem that from a sustainability standpoint, someone would inevitably step up to retrofit leftover containers for this use.  Of course, this pre-fab method cuts 25% of the build time, yet only trims 10% of the contruction costs.  For my 10% however, I&#039;ll take traditional materials and methods.

But yes, my take IS biased and lacks understanding.  As far as &quot;dropping to name calling&quot;?  You may wanna save that for anyone who tries to charge you a half a million (lowballing my guess-timate on this one) for a shipping container loft.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course it&#8217;s biased&#8230; I don&#8217;t like it.  That&#8217;s my bias.  </p>
<p>That&#8217;s why it&#8217;s an &#8220;Opinion&#8221;, they work best when you form your own.</p>
<p>And of course I have an understanding of this quirky little habitation fad, I called everyone I knew in the Shipping Container community, and had asked if I could jump on the bandwagon as well, but they said it was full.</p>
<p>Thing is, I find re-use of shipping containers to be a great idea, when produced in a practical manner, and generally much closer to the ground.  Just because each &#8216;intact&#8217; shipping container can support 35 tons, doesn&#8217;t mean constructing a giant tower is necessarily the best housing solution.</p>
<p>This reminds me of straw-bale housing.  Sure it&#8217;s a great idea, yet maybe not for a gigantic bale housing tower.</p>
<p>And certainly shipping containers could be a great answer to low-income housing.  Personally, if a shipping container was set up with basic amenities, I&#8217;d prefer one in a disaster to the formaldehyde-filled FEMA trailers.</p>
<p>In terms of project scope, this project is very similar to the London Travelodge, as seen here on <a href="http://www.treehugger.com/files/2008/01/travelodge_buil.php" rel="nofollow">Treehugger</a><br />
The construction type seems very similar, and while they&#8217;ve constructed this hotel from custom ordered containers directly from china, it would seem that from a sustainability standpoint, someone would inevitably step up to retrofit leftover containers for this use.  Of course, this pre-fab method cuts 25% of the build time, yet only trims 10% of the contruction costs.  For my 10% however, I&#8217;ll take traditional materials and methods.</p>
<p>But yes, my take IS biased and lacks understanding.  As far as &#8220;dropping to name calling&#8221;?  You may wanna save that for anyone who tries to charge you a half a million (lowballing my guess-timate on this one) for a shipping container loft.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Shipping Container Condos by Katie</title>
		<link>http://thehomecrowd.com/2008/04/12/shipping-container-condos/comment-page-1/#comment-188</link>
		<dc:creator>Katie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 04:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thehomecrowd.com/?p=63#comment-188</guid>
		<description>Honestly, I think your take on the idea is biased and lacks understanding... I was actually researching this idea and came across your article. It was the first negative take I&#039;ve seen yet. 

This isn&#039;t the prettiest (yes pretty) installation I&#039;ve seen in shipping container homes, and it&#039;s more wide spread than you&#039;d think.

Also for someone with little to no income, this is an excellent idea for stable housing units. 

I&#039;m going to end this before I drop to name calling, but perhaps you should have done a LOT more research on the topic before you published the article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly, I think your take on the idea is biased and lacks understanding&#8230; I was actually researching this idea and came across your article. It was the first negative take I&#8217;ve seen yet. </p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t the prettiest (yes pretty) installation I&#8217;ve seen in shipping container homes, and it&#8217;s more wide spread than you&#8217;d think.</p>
<p>Also for someone with little to no income, this is an excellent idea for stable housing units. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to end this before I drop to name calling, but perhaps you should have done a LOT more research on the topic before you published the article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Shrink Wrap unsold / foreclosed homes by Jacob Christensen</title>
		<link>http://thehomecrowd.com/2009/07/29/shrink-wrap-unsold-foreclosed-homes/comment-page-1/#comment-177</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob Christensen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 17:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thehomecrowd.com/?p=245#comment-177</guid>
		<description>Good post! I like to read histories about business who use the crisis to expand their horizonts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post! I like to read histories about business who use the crisis to expand their horizonts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Foreclosures Trashed &#8211; What&#8217;s it worth to prevent this? by The Home Crowd &#124; Shrink Wrap unsold / foreclosed homes</title>
		<link>http://thehomecrowd.com/2008/04/06/foreclosures-trashed-whats-it-worth-to-prevent-this/comment-page-1/#comment-157</link>
		<dc:creator>The Home Crowd &#124; Shrink Wrap unsold / foreclosed homes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 06:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thehomecrowd.com/?p=53#comment-157</guid>
		<description>[...] The new idea however, is wrapping unsold and/or foreclosed homes almost entirely in shrink wrap, protecting them from the elements without the care of a tenant, and possibly deterring vandalism.  Any vandals that want to get past the shrink wrap would likely only need a pocketknife or scissors, but nonetheless, it&#8217;s a nice deterrent from vandals out to strip a foreclosed home of the copper wiring&#8230;or worse. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The new idea however, is wrapping unsold and/or foreclosed homes almost entirely in shrink wrap, protecting them from the elements without the care of a tenant, and possibly deterring vandalism.  Any vandals that want to get past the shrink wrap would likely only need a pocketknife or scissors, but nonetheless, it&#8217;s a nice deterrent from vandals out to strip a foreclosed home of the copper wiring&#8230;or worse. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
